Oligarchy and Elite Politics in The 2020 Local Election: Short Review
Oligarki dan Elit Politik pada Pilkada 2020: Sebuah Ulasan
Abstract
This article analyzes the political practices of oligarchy and elite politics in the context of the 2020 local elections in Indonesia. Despite the high number of Covid-19 cases, Indonesia continued to hold simultaneous local elections, making the regional elections even more controversial. The significance of this research lies in understanding the existence of oligarchic and elite political practices in Indonesia's election administration. The article employs a qualitative method using desk study by analyzing relevant literature to answer the research problem. The novelty of this research is in providing an analysis of the political practices of oligarchy and elite politics in the context of the 2020 local election. The findings indicate that the 2020 local elections were characterized by the re-strengthening of kinship politics, high single candidates, and the involvement of actors with oligarchic interests. These are indications that oligarchic and elite politics are returning to dominate election administration in Indonesia. The implications of this research are essential for understanding the challenges of democratization in Indonesia and the need to strengthen democratic institutions and practices.
Downloads
References
Achwan, R. (2013). Living with Oligarchy: The Clothing Business in Provincial Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 43(2), 276–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2012.757435
Agustino, L., & Yusoff, M. A. (2010). Politik Lokal di Indonesia: Dari Otokratik ke Reformasi Politik. Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 21(1), 5–30. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311432680_Politik_lokal_di_Indonesia_dari_otokratik_ke_reformasi_politik
Ananta, D. D. (2016). Politik Oligarki dan Perampasan Tanah di Indonesia: Kasus Perampasan Tanah di Kabupaten Karawang Tahun 2014. Jurnal Politik, 2(1), 101–135. http://dx.doi.org/10.7454/jp.v2i1.83
Aristama, F. (2020). Sulawesi Urutan Pertama Terpapar Politik Dinasti, Menyusul Sumatera Dan Kalimantan. Rmol.Id. https://politik.rmol.id/read/2020/02/17/421815/sulawesi-urutan-pertama-terpapar-politik-dinasti-menyusul-sumatera-dan-kalimantan
Aspinall, E. (2014). Health care and democratization in Indonesia. Democratization, 21(5), 803–823. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2013.873791
Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2019). Democracy for Sale: Elections, Clientelism, and the State in Indonesia. Cornell University Press.
Bayu, D. J. (2020). Berjayanya Dinasti Politik di Pilkada 2020. Katadata. https://katadata.co.id/ariayudhistira/infografik/5fd84ceba55cb/berjayanya-dinasti-politik-di-pilkada-2020
Carothers, T. (2006). The Backlash Against Democracy Promotion. Foreign Affairs, 85(2), 55–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/20031911
Chalik, A. (2017). Pertarungan Elite dalam Politik Lokal. Pustaka Pelajar.
Credit Suisse. (2019). Global Wealth Report 2019.
Dalilah, E., Selawati, B., Pratama, F., & Wijayanti, A. (2019). Benturan Kepentingan pada Pendanaan Pilkada. Jurnal Antikorupsi Integritas, 5(1), 181–188. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v5i1.391
Diprose, R., McRae, D., & Hadiz, V. R. (2019). Two Decades of Reformasi in Indonesia: Its Illiberal Turn. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 49(5), 691–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2019.1637922
Faedlulloh, D., & Duadji, N. (2019). Birokrasi dan Hoax: Studi Upaya Menjaga Netralitas Aparatur Sipil Negara di Era Post-Truth. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 15(3), 313–332. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v15i3.566
Fitzpatrick, D. (2008). Culture, Ideology and Human Rights: The Case of Indonesia’s Code of Criminal Procedure. In T. Lindsey (Ed.), Indonesia: Law and Society (pp. 499–514). The Federation Press. https://researchgate.net/publication/228184743_Culture_Ideology_and_Human_Rights_The_Case_of_Indonesia's_Code_of_Criminal_Procedure
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw Hill.
Fukuoka, Y. (2013). Indonesia’s “democratic transition” revisited: A clientelist model of political transition. Democratization, 20(6), 991–1013. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2012.669894
Grigoriev, I. S., & Zhirkov, K. (2020). Do political connections make businesspeople richer? Evidence from Russia, 2003–2010. Research and Politics, 7(4), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168020979434
Hadiz, V. R. (2010). Localising Power in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia. Standford University Press.
Hadiz, V. R. (2017). Indonesia’s year of democratic setbacks: towards a new phase of deepening illiberalism? Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 53(3), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2017.1410311
Hadiz, V. R., & Robison, R. (2014). Ekonomi Politik Oligarki dan Pengorganisasian Kembali Kekuasaan di Indonesia. Prisma - Jurnal Pemikiran Sosial Ekonomi, 33(1), 35–56.
Hakim, S. (2020). Khawatir klaster Covid-19, Survei: publik tolak pelaksanaan pilkada. Antaranews. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/1757829/khawatir-klaster-covid-19-survei-publik-tolak-pelaksanaan-pilkada
Hanafi, R. I. (2014). Pemilihan Langsung Kepala Daerah di Indonesia: Beberapa Catatan Kritis untuk Partai Politik. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 11(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v11i2.197
Hermawan, D., & Kurniawan, R. C. (2019). Distributive Politics and Manipulative Policy in Local Election. Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review, 4(2), 180–190. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/ipsr.v4i2.19122
Hidayaturrahman, M., Ngarawula, B., & Sadhana, K. (2020). Political Investors: Political Elite Oligarchy and Mastery of Regional Resources in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057891120917213
Jaringan Advokasi Tambang. (2020). Pilkada 2020: Vaksin Imunitas bagi Oligarki.
Kurniawan, R. C., Hermawan, D., Indrajat, H., & Kurniawan, B. (2019). Capitalism and Corporate in Lampung Local Politics. Komunitas: International Journal of Indonesian Society and Culture, 11(1), 22–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/komunitas.v11i1.13161
Kusuma, H. (2020). Perputaran Uang Selama Pilkada Diprediksi Tembus Rp 26 T. Detik. https://finance.detik.com/berita-ekonomi-bisnis/d-5197908/perputaran-uang-selama-pilkada-diprediksi-tembus-rp-26-t
Kusumaningtyas, A. N., Dewi, K. H., Ekawati, E., & Izzati, F. F. (2017). Perempuan Kepala Daerah dalam Jejaring Oligarki Lokal. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 14(2), 243–264. https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v14i2.721
Maharani, T. (2020). Riset Nagara Institute: 124 Calon Kepala Daerah pada Pilkada 2020 Terkait Dinasti Politik. Kompas. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2020/10/15/17280341/riset-nagara-institute-124-calon-kepala-daerah-pada-pilkada-2020-terkait?page=all
Mietzner, M. (2009). Indonesia’s 2009 elections: populism, dynasties and the consolidation of the party system.
Nurhasim, M. (2018). Koalisi Nano-Nano Pilkada Serentak 2018. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 15(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v15i2.760
Purnamasari, D. M. (2020). Wapres: Pilkada Tetap Digelar untuk Penuhi Hak Konstitusi Rakyat. Kompas. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2020/10/28/14044091/wapres-pilkada-tetap-digelar-untuk-penuhi-hak-konstitusi-rakyat
Robinson, R., & Hadiz, V. (2004). Reorganizing Power In Indonesia: The Politics of Oligarchy in an Age of Markets. Routledge.
Rüland, J. (2021). Democratic backsliding, regional governance and foreign policymaking in Southeast Asia: ASEAN, Indonesia and the Philippines. Democratization, 28(1), 237–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1803284
Setyowati, A. (2020). Kontroversi Pilkada 2020 di Tengah Pandemi Covid-19. Kompas. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2020/10/06/10064311/kontroversi-pilkada-2020-di-tengah-pandemi-covid-19
Supriatma, A. M. T. (2020). Politik Indonesia: Bergerak ke Arah Kartel? In A. M. Mudhoffir & C. H. Pontoh (Eds.), Oligarki Teori dan Kritik (p. 227). Marjin Kiri. https://www.academia.edu/2624379/Politik_Indonesia_Bergerak_Kearah_Kartel
Susanti, M. H. (2018). Dinasti Politik dalam Pilkada di Indonesia. Journal of Government and Civil Society, 1(2), 111. https://doi.org/10.31000/jgcs.v1i2.440
Suwondo, D. (2020). Pengalaman Pilkada Langsung dan Kesiapan Polri dalam Pengamanan Pelaksanaan Pilkada 2020. Jurnal Litbang Polri, 23(2), 54–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46976/litbangpolri.v23i2.102
Talitha, T., Firman, T., & Hudalah, D. (2020). Welcoming two decades of decentralization in Indonesia: a regional development perspective. Territory, Politics, Governance, 8(5), 690–708. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2019.1601595
The Indonesian Institute. (2018). Riski Wicaksono: Pilkada Serentak 2018 Beri Dampak Positif terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi. The Indonesian Institute. https://www.theindonesianinstitute.com/riski-wicaksono-pilkada-serentak-2018-beri-dampak-positif-terhadap-pertumbuhan-ekonomi/
Winters, J. (2011). Oligarchy. Cambridge University Press.
Zuada, L. H. H., Suaib, E., & Syifatu, W. (2016). Desentralisasi dan Oligarki Predator di Wakatobi: Peran Oligarki dan Elit Penentu dalam Pembangunan Perdesaan. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 13(2), 167–191. https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v13i2.557
Zuhro, R. S. (2019). Demokrasi dan Pemilu Presiden 2019. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 16(1), 69–81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v16i1.782
Copyright (c) 2023 Dodi Faedlulloh, Rahayu Sulistiowati, Apandi Apandi, Vina Karmilasari

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Atribusi-Non Commercial-Share Alike (CC BY-NC-SA).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Every publication (printed/electronic) are open access for educational purposes, research, and library. Other than the aims mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violation.